News:

Moderation Team: Vette, babywhales, Bob In PA, gregf, bighitterdalama, beaugestus, T200

Owner: MightyGiants

Link To Live Chat

Mastodon

Main Menu

An under-rated WR prospect (so far), a future star

Started by XNYrnLA, February 18, 2017, 02:52:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

XNYrnLA

Quote from: todge on February 19, 2017, 11:42:53 AM
That is very true. With all due respect to this thread and XLA, the Giants already have two smallish Xs on this roster in Lewis and King.  What they don't have and need is a big WR in the 6-3+ range.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Todge,
The Patriots proved again that there is not a very specific size or speed requirement for Wide Receivers and possibly other skilled positions... the only requirement is talent and ability... the best barometer for equating that in prospects is achievement stats and this kid has proven he can play at a high level at the position.
"" This team is now 3 players away from being a winning playoff team ""

quacker

Quote from: XNYrnLA on February 20, 2017, 01:00:56 AM
Todge,
The Patriots proved again that there is not a very specific size or speed requirement for Wide Receivers and possibly other skilled positions... the only requirement is talent and ability... the best barometer for equating that in prospects is achievement stats and this kid has proven he can play at a high level at the position.
Having Brady drop passes on your hands helps a bit too.

todge

Quote from: XNYrnLA on February 20, 2017, 01:00:56 AM
Todge,
The Patriots proved again that there is not a very specific size or speed requirement for Wide Receivers and possibly other skilled positions... the only requirement is talent and ability... the best barometer for equating that in prospects is achievement stats and this kid has proven he can play at a high level at the position.

So are you saying that in Giant management meetings, they are pointing to the Pats as not having a big WR on their team.  So they don't need one either?  OK I guess we will see.