Big Blue Huddle

General Category => Big Blue Huddle => BBH Archive => Topic started by: MightyGiants on March 23, 2008, 01:27:27 PM

Title: Distinguishing Between Fact, Opinion, Belief, and Prejudice
Post by: MightyGiants on March 23, 2008, 01:27:27 PM
BigHitter posted a similar post back in the BBWC days.  I found it to be very helpful to me personally.  I try to keep these points in mind whenever I make a post.  I find if you are careful to appreciate which catagory, a point your are making, falls into, posts are much better accepted.  If one is sure to include things like "I believe", "in my opinion" or "I feel" one usually finds that their posts and points are much better accepted by the majority of readers.  This in turn creates a higher level of respect.   


Distinguishing Between Fact, Opinion, Belief, and Prejudice

When forming personal convictions, we often interpret factual evidence through the filter of our values, feelings, tastes, and past experiences. Hence, most statements we make in speaking and writing are assertions of fact, opinion, belief, or prejudice. The usefulness and acceptability of an assertion can be improved or diminished by the nature of the assertion, depending on which of the following categories it falls into:

A fact is verifiable. We can determine whether it is true by researching the evidence. This may involve numbers, dates, testimony, etc. (Ex.: "World War II ended in 1945.") The truth of the fact is beyond argument if one can assume that measuring devices or records or memories are correct. Facts provide crucial support for the assertion of an argument. However, facts by themselves are worthless unless we put them in context, draw conclusions, and, thus, give them meaning.

An opinion is a judgment based on facts, an honest attempt to draw a reasonable conclusion from factual evidence. (For example, we know that millions of people go without proper medical care, and so you form the opinion that the country should institute national health insurance even though it would cost billions of dollars.) An opinion is potentially changeable--depending on how the evidence is interpreted. By themselves, opinions have little power to convince. You must always let your reader know what your evidence is and how it led you to arrive at your opinion.

Unlike an opinion, a belief is a conviction based on cultural or personal faith, morality, or values. Statements such as "Capital punishment is legalized murder" are often called "opinions" because they express viewpoints, but they are not based on facts or other evidence. They cannot be disproved or even contested in a rational or logical manner. Since beliefs are inarguable, they cannot serve as the thesis of a formal argument. (Emotional appeals can, of course, be useful if you happen to know that your audience shares those beliefs.)

Another kind of assertion that has no place in serious argumentation is prejudice, a half-baked opinion based on insufficient or unexamined evidence. (Ex.: "Women are bad drivers.") Unlike a belief, a prejudice is testable: it can be contested and disproved on the basis of facts. We often form prejudices or accept them from others--family, friends, the media, etc.--without questioning their meaning or testing their truth. At best, prejudices are careless oversimplifications. At worst, they reflect a narrow-minded view of the world. Most of all, they are not likely to win the confidence or agreement of your readers.

(Adapted from: Fowler, H. Ramsey. The Little, Brown Handbook. Boston: Little, Brown, 1986.)
Title: Re: Distinguishing Between Fact, Opinion, Belief, and Prejudice
Post by: giantsguy on March 23, 2008, 07:29:42 PM
Thanks Rich... "In my opinion," this applies to life as well. 
Title: Re: Distinguishing Between Fact, Opinion, Belief, and Prejudice
Post by: MightyGiants on March 23, 2008, 09:01:45 PM
I would agree George.
Title: Re: Distinguishing Between Fact, Opinion, Belief, and Prejudice
Post by: bighitterdalama on March 24, 2008, 12:06:27 AM
Richie,

Nice work. I had already constructed a thread myself on this subject. I posted it separately because I intend to blog it. If only I can remember how.

Brian.
Title: Re: Distinguishing Between Fact, Opinion, Belief, and Prejudice
Post by: XNYrnLA on March 24, 2008, 03:18:48 AM
All well and reasonable, except the example on women drivers.  :no: :laugh:
Title: Re: Distinguishing Between Fact, Opinion, Belief, and Prejudice
Post by: pagan43 on March 24, 2008, 08:43:26 AM
Thanks Richie,

It will serve us all well to remember these simple tenants when, in the heat of the season, we are all tempted to stray from facts and toward opinions and beliefs.

In a forum such as ours, a statement of pure opinion or belief is not specifically ouit of context. This is the very place for them, I think.

The danger is in being rude or disrespectful of others by asserting an opinion or beleif, or denouncing the opinions or beliefs of others.

We all need to maintain a handle on exactly what is being stated, and how far we will each go to support or disclaim it.

Gentlemen (and ladies) can easily live in a place that allows all forms of discussion to exist.

pagan43

Title: Re: Distinguishing Between Fact, Opinion, Belief, and Prejudice
Post by: MightyGiants on March 24, 2008, 09:34:36 AM
Well said Pagan!   :ok: