Quote from: kingm56 on Today at 08:45:48 AMI've been trying to reconcile this move too, Matt. Here's the best I could do:
1. They want an insurance policy for a 35 year old QB coming off an ACL injury
2. If Penix showcases some skills, his potential trade value could be worth more than '' pick; thus, representing a positive ROI.
Matt,
The only thing I could think of to rationalize the pick is that Cousins is 36 and not a long-term solution and now they potentially have that solution when Cousins is gone. Just seems odd to me for a team to be thinking about 2026 and beyond when they have not had a winning record or playoff appearance since 2017.
Signing a 36 year old QB to that kind of guaranteed money after an Achilles injury is questionable, but was understandable given their situation. Taking their future QB the same year is nothing short of bizarre IMO.
If they are worried about Cousins injury to start the season, signing a high end backup seems more reasonable than drafting another QB at #10.