Nevermind, I was looking at True Pass Sets.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: B1GBLUE on September 18, 2023, 12:01:06 PMwe KILLED them on play action in the second half. which is kinda crazy considering the run game wasnt doing much and we kept going back to the PA. bad coaching/play on arizona for that.Exactly.
Quote from: MightyGiants on September 18, 2023, 11:44:02 AMFor what it's worth, analytics people who have studied this, have found the effectiveness of the running game has little impact on the effectiveness of the use of play action. While I have heard that more than a few times, I will admit instinctively, I have trouble accepting it completely. Although I could see how well the QB and RB "sell" the play action might also play a big role in how well it will work.They do sell it well.
Quote from: BluesCruz on September 18, 2023, 11:43:37 AMEd would you say Barkley has good hands for a RB?I think Breda and Grey will be better Receivers.
He seems to get in trouble thinking about his next move or where the opponent is rather than just securing the football 1st and foremost. In his defense, Jones often throws him the ball in traffic....thats on Jones
Other RBs like say Brightwell will work in more open space as opponents assign shadows to Barkley
Quote from: Stringer Bell on September 18, 2023, 11:32:58 AMKT and Williams combined for 99 snaps, and the Giants got 0s across the board. Wink needs to figure something out with these 2. And if not, I'd like to see more of Basham and Riley.Maybe it's time to look at the Position Coaches.
Quote from: MightyGiants on September 18, 2023, 11:22:24 AMEd,Film shows they bite on play action. But no, only in certain situations because he is in motion often or stays in to block. 17 attempts and take away his long and its 47 yards.
At this point, if you were a DC, would you focus on stopping Barkley (assuming good health)?
Quote from: MightyGiants on September 18, 2023, 11:07:52 AMNot sure this is the case."What's missing for sure is the threat of Barkley. That's good and bad. It's bad because play action won't be nearly as effective unless they are effective gaining yards on the ground, so they have to earn it. It's good because they won't load the box unless the run game is effective."
Against AZ Barkley had- 17 carries 63 yards 3.7 yds/cary 16 yards long 1 TD and caused one INT
receiving in that same game- 6 rec 7 targets 29 yards 4.8 yds/rec 10 yards long 1 TD
Barkley had similar numbers in the Dallas games (some areas a little better some a little worse).
I don't think those numbers indicate crucial contributions that can't be duplicated by others.