So they are taking a QB or a WR! Pretty sure that has been the sentiment for awhile now as it just makes too much sense.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: andrew_nyGiants on April 18, 2024, 03:57:59 PMMy interest in trading down hinges on two things:
1) The trading partner offers a top 12-15 pick
and
2) We get a 1st rounder next year as part of the trade.
If they can achieve those two objectives, I'm all in on a trade down.
Quote from: MightyGiants on April 19, 2024, 09:43:34 AMJoe,
I think one way to see which way you lean is which type of draft trade you generally prefer.
1) Trade up to grab to grab a better prospect
2) Trade down to get more picks
Quote from: Philosophers on April 04, 2024, 03:56:00 PMHe had one long catch for something like 40 yards but he was held quiet for everything else with 4 catches for 40 yards. He didnt dominate at all in the championship game.
Quote from: MightyGiants on April 03, 2024, 12:09:56 PMhttps://x.com/MoveTheSticks/status/1775546570446106891?s=20
Quote from: files58 on March 28, 2024, 11:18:38 AMAt that site was a mock draft where Denver traded up with the Chargers at 5. They gave up the #12, #136, and next year's #1 for JJ. If the Giants FO likes JJ they would be in a much better position at #6 to move up 1 spot. The Chargers could then take their choice of OL as they would at #5.
Quote from: GloryDays on March 26, 2024, 05:34:19 PMNeither... trade back if possible and take Ladd McConkey, plus another high pick or two... much higher value than one of those three imo.
Quote from: andrew_nyGiants on March 23, 2024, 03:27:39 PMIn separation? Or as an overall WR?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro