Big Blue Huddle

General Category => Big Blue Huddle => Topic started by: MightyGiants on January 06, 2024, 02:49:00 PM

Title: Sterling Shepard
Post by: MightyGiants on January 06, 2024, 02:49:00 PM
As you are aware, I listen to a lot of Giants and football podcasts.   As I listen to the beat reporters talk about Sterling Shepard (and his likely departure) I get a sense he means more to them than Shep means to the fans.

It seems to me that even though Shep seems like a great guy, he has been hurt so much during his Giants career that he is almost an afterthought among fans.  I think the beat reporters who got to spend more time with Shep are the ones who will really miss him.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Doc16LT56 on January 06, 2024, 04:08:07 PM
I agree. I also think Shepard in some ways represents a lot of what's gone wrong with this organization over the last decade. The prioritization of personality and public relations over production. Shepard is a good guy and a good teammate. But he's been extremely unreliable and was given a big contract he didn't deserve. He shouldn't have made the roster this season but they kept him for sentimental reasons.

I wish him well in retirement. Nice guy. Unreliable. Overpaid for a time and overrated. Time to turn the page and move past the era of scholarships.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: ozzie on January 06, 2024, 07:06:35 PM
He's the kind of guy I hope the organization creates a position for after he retires as a player. Shepard embodies "Once a Giant, always a Giant"!
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: DaveBrown74 on January 06, 2024, 07:43:06 PM
I have nothing against Shepard. He himself has done nothing wrong. He's a high effort guy who has been a great teammate and has played fearlessly and unselfishly.

My issue is with the team and the way it gets emotional about its own players and often engages in profligate behavior as a result of that.

If they feel particular affinity or loyalty to a given player, they can express that by offering that player employment opportunities after retirement, ring of honor, etc. To waste cap space and roster spots on players who are no longer up to scratch, purely for emotional reasons is not what an NFL team that is serious about winning should be doing.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: nb587 on January 06, 2024, 10:07:47 PM
I dont get how they kept Shepard and didnt use him.  Crowder would have been far more effective as a punt returner and probably also as a WR.  If they had an experienced returner on the roster then keeping Shepard could have made sense if he had anything left in the tank which he didn't.  For that matter, why not re-sign Richie James instead of Shepherd. 

When Shepard made the team, I thought they had lots of plays in the playbook for him. Clearly I was wrong.  Unfortunately, the most logical explanation for keeping an injury prone over the hill Wr at the expense of others who would add value suggests to me it came from Mara. 
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: DaveBrown74 on January 07, 2024, 08:24:23 AM
Quote from: nb587 on January 06, 2024, 10:07:47 PMI dont get how they kept Shepard and didnt use him.  Crowder would have been far more effective as a punt returner and probably also as a WR.  If they had an experienced returner on the roster then keeping Shepard could have made sense if he had anything left in the tank which he didn't.  For that matter, why not re-sign Richie James instead of Shepherd. 

When Shepard made the team, I thought they had lots of plays in the playbook for him. Clearly I was wrong.  Unfortunately, the most logical explanation for keeping an injury prone over the hill Wr at the expense of others who would add value suggests to me it came from Mara. 

I think that is probably a reasonable assumption to make.

I suspect Schoen/Daboll have a tacit policy amongst themselves of "picking their battles" with Mara. If they throw him a bone on relatively small things like keeping Shep and not firing McGaughey, maybe they think that gives them more latitude on some of the bigger things like not caving to Barkley.

To your point though, the Shepard thing wasn't that small of a thing. Having Crowder or James there instead of him would have made a difference.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Ed Vette on January 07, 2024, 11:30:18 AM
There were a lot of ifs going on. How would WDR come back after the injury? How would Jalin Hyatt progress? Would Waller hold up, which he didn't. Shep was a sure-handed Receiver and could run a full route tree. That's why they kept him. Beasley got injured and he was the backup quick game guy. Crowder is a good Special Teams guy but he can't be relied upon to do what Shep does. He's 31 this year so it's doubtful he will be back. I'm sure he was a mentor to the young Receivers as I saw him coaching them up at Training Camp.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 11:32:58 AM
Quote from: Doc16LT56 on January 06, 2024, 04:08:07 PMI agree. I also think Shepard in some ways represents a lot of what's gone wrong with this organization over the last decade. The prioritization of personality and public relations over production. Shepard is a good guy and a good teammate. But he's been extremely unreliable and was given a big contract he didn't deserve. He shouldn't have made the roster this season but they kept him for sentimental reasons.

I wish him well in retirement. Nice guy. Unreliable. Overpaid for a time and overrated. Time to turn the page and move past the era of scholarships.

Outside of Shep the only drafted players who have been give extensions who are still on this team are Thomas, Dex, Slayton and Jones. You make it seem like every average player is getting some contract extension that they do not deserve. We are actually letting too many good players go like Julian Love who just made the Pro Bowl, which shatters the argument that none of them were worth re-signing.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: LennG on January 07, 2024, 11:45:23 AM

SS is what we like to think of as a true Giant. He does what he is told, took countless hits over the middle and never, ever complained. Problem is, he took up a roster spot when we could have used it for other players who might have contributed a lot more.
Couldn't SS be put on the practice squad each week and if needed, brought up?

I wish him well and hope the Giants use his knowledge maybe for a coaching position.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Doc16LT56 on January 07, 2024, 12:10:58 PM
Quote from: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 11:32:58 AMOutside of Shep the only drafted players who have been give extensions who are still on this team are Thomas, Dex, Slayton and Jones. You make it seem like every average player is getting some contract extension that they do not deserve. We are actually letting too many good players go like Julian Love who just made the Pro Bowl, which shatters the argument that none of them were worth re-signing.
My point isn't about signing your best players to contract extensions. There were two egregious errors made with Shep in my opinion.

1.They signed Shep to a big extension while he still had another year and change on his contract. This was done immediately after trading OBJ and looked like Gettleman's attempt to manage the public relations aspect (i.e., we can live without OBJ, Shep is our guy). That contract made him one of the highest paid slot receivers at the time. He had the worst year of his career after that which made the contract look even worse.

2. They gave Shep a roster spot this year that he clearly didn't earn or deserve. Shep is so washed up that the team all but announced his retirement this week by telling the fans Shep would be the last player announced at the start of the game with the starters so he can get one final ovation. They could've figured out a way to get Shepard fan appreciation without tying up a roster spot for a full season. He played only 14% of snaps on offense this year and doesn't contribute on special teams. There was no logical reason he should've been given a roster spot.

Remember the last game of last season when they made the big spectacle of getting Kenny Golladay his first TD because everyone knew he wasn't playing in the playoffs and everyone knew his Giants career was effectively over?

This is bush league stuff done solely for public relations purposes. It has nothing to do with winning games or building a team.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 01:46:05 PM
Quote from: Doc16LT56 on January 07, 2024, 12:10:58 PMMy point isn't about signing your best players to contract extensions. There were two egregious errors made with Shep in my opinion.

1.They signed Shep to a big extension while he still had another year and change on his contract. This was done immediately after trading OBJ and looked like Gettleman's attempt to manage the public relations aspect (i.e., we can live without OBJ, Shep is our guy). That contract made him one of the highest paid slot receivers at the time. He had the worst year of his career after that which made the contract look even worse.

2. They gave Shep a roster spot this year that he clearly didn't earn or deserve. Shep is so washed up that the team all but announced his retirement this week by telling the fans Shep would be the last player announced at the start of the game with the starters so he can get one final ovation. They could've figured out a way to get Shepard fan appreciation without tying up a roster spot for a full season. He played only 14% of snaps on offense this year and doesn't contribute on special teams. There was no logical reason he should've been given a roster spot.

Remember the last game of last season when they made the big spectacle of getting Kenny Golladay his first TD because everyone knew he wasn't playing in the playoffs and everyone knew his Giants career was effectively over?

This is bush league stuff done solely for public relations purposes. It has nothing to do with winning games or building a team.

That's all fine but don't make it out like the current and former GM were just handing out "scholorships" left and right. Shep deserved his first extension. It was reasonable and there is nothing wrong with taking care of a player a year early if you believe in them. Should we have waited till after tomorrow to extend Dex who would have the franchise tag card as a negotiating tool? We took care of Thomas 2 years before we had to since his 5th year option would have easily been picked up.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Doc16LT56 on January 07, 2024, 02:03:00 PM
Quote from: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 01:46:05 PMThat's all fine but don't make it out like the current and former GM were just handing out "scholorships" left and right. Shep deserved his first extension. It was reasonable and there is nothing wrong with taking care of a player a year early if you believe in them. Should we have waited till after tomorrow to extend Dex who would have the franchise tag card as a negotiating tool? We took care of Thomas 2 years before we had to since his 5th year option would have easily been picked up.
I got the term "on scholarship" from Carl Banks years back when he was still willing to criticize the organization. Banks used to say there were players on the roster who were only kept because they had a big name or because they were drafted. He called them scholarship players.

Sterling Shepard was clearly a scholarship player this year. 14% of snaps on offense and no contribution on special teams. It doesn't get much more egregious than that.

I disagree about the extension Gettleman gave him. Paying more than 20 million per year at the time for Shepard and Golden Tate to soften the public criticism of losing OBJ was malpractice. Defend Gettleman all you want. I thought it was an idiotic decision at the time and I stand by that.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 03:22:04 PM
Quote from: Doc16LT56 on January 07, 2024, 02:03:00 PMI got the term "on scholarship" from Carl Banks years back when he was still willing to criticize the organization. Banks used to say there were players on the roster who were only kept because they had a big name or because they were drafted. He called them scholarship players.

Sterling Shepard was clearly a scholarship player this year. 14% of snaps on offense and no contribution on special teams. It doesn't get much more egregious than that.

I disagree about the extension Gettleman gave him. Paying more than 20 million per year at the time for Shepard and Golden Tate to soften the public criticism of losing OBJ was malpractice. Defend Gettleman all you want. I thought it was an idiotic decision at the time and I stand by that.

So I guess Eli Manning was a scholarship player. The Giants held onto him about 2 years 2 long. I am not defending Gettleman. He was a lying you know what who extended OBJ, said he wasn't signed to trade him and then traded him and replace him with Golden Tate and Kenny Golladay. I am just curious as to who are all these other "scholarship" players that Banks is talking about outside of Shep. You have only given 1 example!
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: MightyGiants on January 07, 2024, 04:08:09 PM
I feel like the departure of a favored substitute teacher rather than the departure of your favorite teacher.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Doc16LT56 on January 07, 2024, 05:13:18 PM
Quote from: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 03:22:04 PMSo I guess Eli Manning was a scholarship player. The Giants held onto him about 2 years 2 long. I am not defending Gettleman. He was a lying you know what who extended OBJ, said he wasn't signed to trade him and then traded him and replace him with Golden Tate and Kenny Golladay. I am just curious as to who are all these other "scholarship" players that Banks is talking about outside of Shep. You have only given 1 example!
If I recall correctly, the guys Banks used to talk about as scholarship guys were guys like Ximines, Hosley, Jernigan, Brewer, Cooper Taylor. Guys like that. Banks doesn't share info like this anymore so it's hard to know where he really stands on this new generation of young players.

There was also the Jonathan Stewart fiasco where a washed player was paid over 3 million to be a locker room informant.

You aren't going to find a lot of examples of players being paid to not play (who aren't being developed). What they did with Sterling Shepard this year amounts to a parting gift. This, I think, is unusual in the NFL.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 05:18:59 PM
Quote from: Doc16LT56 on January 07, 2024, 05:13:18 PMIf I recall correctly, the guys Banks used to talk about as scholarship guys were guys like Ximines, Hosley, Jernigan, Brewer, Cooper Taylor. Guys like that. Banks doesn't share info like this anymore so it's hard to know where he really stands on this new generation of young players.

There was also the Jonathan Stewart fiasco where a washed player was paid over 3 million to be a locker room informant.

You aren't going to find a lot of examples of players being paid to not play (who aren't being developed). What they did with Sterling Shepard this year amounts to a parting gift. This, I think, is unusual in the NFL.

None of those players ever got extended from my recollection nor did they even matter much.

Stewart was another bad Gettleman signing and I have already expressed my hatred of him.

There aren't more examples like Shepard because they don't exist! you can keep this going and I will counter with facts.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Doc16LT56 on January 07, 2024, 05:23:44 PM
Quote from: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 05:18:59 PMNone of those players ever got extended from my recollection nor did they even matter much.

Stewart was another bad Gettleman signing and I have already expressed my hatred of him.

There aren't more examples like Shepard because they don't exist! you can keep this going and I will counter with facts.
You're just saying anything. I never said they were extended. I said they were kept on the roster for multiple seasons despite not earning it.

The reason the Shepard example is so egregious is because is isn't supposed to be done, that's why there aren't examples of the Shepard idiocy. Why is this so difficult for you to grasp?
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Philosophers on January 07, 2024, 05:28:32 PM
Wan'Dale Robinson is what I thought Sheppard would be.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 05:32:08 PM
Quote from: Doc16LT56 on January 07, 2024, 05:23:44 PMYou're just saying anything. I never said they were extended. I said they were kept on the roster for multiple seasons despite not earning it.

The reason the Shepard example is so egregious is because is isn't supposed to be done, that's why there aren't examples of the Shepard idiocy. Why is this so difficult for you to grasp?

Teams don't like to give up on drafted talent so easily. Holsey was a decent player as was Ximenes. If someone would have beaten them out in training camp they would have been cut. Now except for Ximenes those players Banks pointed out were Jerry Reese players. We're talking 2 GM regimes ago.

Shepard was kept in case Robinson never broke out and Hyatt was a bust. When both players became starting receivers there was no room for more snaps for Shepard. So we lost Cole Beasley and David Sills. Where are they now? They player who shouldn't have been signed was Parris Campbell.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Trench on January 07, 2024, 05:35:18 PM
I always felt Shep was a good Giant. On field he made some costly drops and many times wouldn't quite get to the marker on his route which was frustrating - but he's a gamer and hopefully has a future with the organization
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Doc16LT56 on January 07, 2024, 05:37:21 PM
Quote from: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 05:32:08 PMTeams don't like to give up on drafted talent so easily. Holsey was a decent player as was Ximenes. If someone would have beaten them out in training camp they would have been cut. Now except for Ximenes those players Banks pointed out were Jerry Reese players. We're talking 2 GM regimes ago.

Shepard was kept in case Robinson never broke out and Hyatt was a bust. When both players became starting receivers there was no room for more snaps for Shepard. So we lost Cole Beasley and David Sills. Where are they now? They player who shouldn't have been signed was Parris Campbell.
It's like talking to the wall...
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: TDToomer on January 07, 2024, 05:48:44 PM
Quote from: Doc16LT56 on January 07, 2024, 05:37:21 PMIt's like talking to the wall...

Wall, meet wall. Wall, meet wall.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: drakew on January 07, 2024, 05:50:32 PM
filthy beagles now down but notout...
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Bob In PA on January 08, 2024, 09:08:13 AM
Maybe the Giants will have a coaching (or other organizational) position to offer him. Give it a few days. Bob
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Slugsy-Narrows on January 08, 2024, 09:35:01 AM
Quote from: Bob In PA on January 08, 2024, 09:08:13 AMMaybe the Giants will have a coaching (or other organizational) position to offer him. Give it a few days. Bob

I could see Shep staying on as an Asst Coach!  Last year once injured many players commented on how Shep would help them during practices and games.  Respected Vet and man.  Wouldn't be a bad move!

I like Shep.  When healthy he did right by the Gmen and made some great plays!  His body didn't hold up.  Wan is coming into that roll strong!  It's time to move on.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Fletch on January 08, 2024, 02:26:18 PM
Quote from: DaveBrown74 on January 07, 2024, 08:24:23 AMI think that is probably a reasonable assumption to make.

I suspect Schoen/Daboll have a tacit policy amongst themselves of "picking their battles" with Mara. If they throw him a bone on relatively small things like keeping Shep and not firing McGaughey, maybe they think that gives them more latitude on some of the bigger things like not caving to Barkley.

To your point though, the Shepard thing wasn't that small of a thing. Having Crowder or James there instead of him would have made a difference.

Caving to Barkley is more forgivable than having Shep around. He should have been cut 2 years ago. Also that contract wtf?

I can imagine worse things than overpaying for a RB on a 5 win team.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Ed Vette on January 09, 2024, 08:28:19 PM
It's reported that Sterling Shepard announced his retirement. A great teammate and a man of high character.

Good luck on the next Chapter!
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: T200 on January 09, 2024, 08:33:53 PM


Looks like he's hanging them up.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20240110/43b8b9e77cc91989b9019fef83413ccf.jpg)

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: uconnjack8 on January 09, 2024, 10:06:53 PM
Best of luck with future endeavors Sterling.

My only comment on the other stuff:  If he was on the roster because the "organization " is overly sentimental,  we know the GM and HC didn't make that decision.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: TDToomer on January 10, 2024, 08:44:02 AM
Quote from: uconnjack8 on January 09, 2024, 10:06:53 PMBest of luck with future endeavors Sterling.

My only comment on the other stuff:  If he was on the roster because the "organization " is overly sentimental,  we know the GM and HC didn't make that decision.

I disagree. He beat out Sills who is a nobody and Beasley who wasn't healthy enough to play. You could argue he outplayed the worst receiver on the team in Campbell. He just wasn't in the WR rotation. 
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: uconnjack8 on January 10, 2024, 09:21:11 AM
Quote from: TDToomer on January 10, 2024, 08:44:02 AMI disagree. He beat out Sills who is a nobody and Beasley who wasn't healthy enough to play. You could argue he outplayed the worst receiver on the team in Campbell. He just wasn't in the WR rotation. 

What is it you are disagreeing with?  I am not saying his roster spot was sentimental as some have stated.  I am saying if it was, there was no reason for Daboll or Schoen to have those feelings toward Shepard who was with the Giants long before they were.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: MightyGiants on January 10, 2024, 09:25:37 AM
my failing eyes couldn't read this, so here is the text for my fellow blind as a bats


sterlingshepard
 
15h
Forever grateful to the New York Giants organization, past and present teammates, and the incredible fan base for their unwavering love and support over the past 8 years. New Jersey, my second home, will forever hold a special place in my heart. Thank you for embracing me with open arms and making me feel like family. Once a Giant, always a Giant! #GiantsNation #forevergreatful


Quote from: T200 on January 09, 2024, 08:33:53 PMLooks like he's hanging them up.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20240110/43b8b9e77cc91989b9019fef83413ccf.jpg)

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk


Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: TDToomer on January 10, 2024, 09:27:48 AM
Quote from: uconnjack8 on January 10, 2024, 09:21:11 AMWhat is it you are disagreeing with?  I am not saying his roster spot was sentimental as some have stated.  I am saying if it was, there was no reason for Daboll or Schoen to have those feelings toward Shepard who was with the Giants long before they were.

Which further shows that he was here on merit and not sentiment.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: uconnjack8 on January 10, 2024, 09:36:12 AM
Quote from: TDToomer on January 10, 2024, 09:27:48 AMWhich further shows that he was here on merit and not sentiment.
Unless ownership said that he gets a roster spot.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Doc16LT56 on January 10, 2024, 09:55:42 AM
Yes, the merit of 57 total receiving yards and zero contributions on special teams. But he had to hold a roster spot for the entire season with no upside for development. Smh, how ridiculous some of you sound.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: DaveBrown74 on January 10, 2024, 11:19:16 AM
Shep's occupation of a precious roster spot this year made zero football sense. We said it at the time of the decision, and it proved to be true. It was entirely sentimental and for leadership/cheerleading/locker room purposes. If the coaches really felt that was worth burning a roster spot for, ok, but to the extent that wins and losses actually matter, it's hard to find any evidence that his being there helped. He certainly did not produce anything on the field.

And frankly, if the other players on the team need Shep running around screaming on the sidelines and patting them on the back as they come off the field in order to try their hardest and play their best, then we have even bigger issues than it appears.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: londonblue on January 10, 2024, 11:48:56 AM
Shep has played hard, played hurt and played with heart across his career with us. He has been a good and loyal servant. He is not a legend but he deserves more respect than some are showing him. I wish him only the best in the future.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: Doc16LT56 on January 10, 2024, 12:14:18 PM
Quote from: londonblue on January 10, 2024, 11:48:56 AMShep has played hard, played hurt and played with heart across his career with us. He has been a good and loyal servant. He is not a legend but he deserves more respect than some are showing him. I wish him only the best in the future.
He was one of the best compensated and least reliable players during one of the franchise's lowest eras of its history. Can we please stop talking about Shep like he's Amani Toomer. Everyone who puts on shoulder pads and a helmet deserves respect. They are not, however, entitled to a roster spot. Please let's not pretend the discussion is about anything other than that.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: MightyGiants on January 10, 2024, 02:55:40 PM
https://x.com/TalkinGiants/status/1744861009255211375?s=20

I heard Shep retired.  I wouldn't be surprised if he goes into broadcasting or maybe coaching.
Title: Re: Sterling Shepard
Post by: DaveBrown74 on January 10, 2024, 03:57:56 PM
Quote from: londonblue on January 10, 2024, 11:48:56 AMShep has played hard, played hurt and played with heart across his career with us. He has been a good and loyal servant. He is not a legend but he deserves more respect than some are showing him. I wish him only the best in the future.

Not sure to whom you are referring, but to speak for myself and for clarity's sake, this is what I posted earlier in this thread:

"I have nothing against Shepard. He himself has done nothing wrong. He's a high effort guy who has been a great teammate and has played fearlessly and unselfishly.

My issue is with the team and the way it gets emotional about its own players and often engages in profligate behavior as a result of that."


I have recognized in a laudatory manner who Shep is as a player and a person. I would say the above is pretty respectful. That doesn't mean I have to think he should have been given a roster spot this year nor does it mean I need to pretend he was good on the field this year when we know he wasn't.

I don't think anyone has shown this player disrespect. The issues are with the overly sentimental and often profligate way the team behaves at times with certain personnel. Citing that issue is not dissing Shepard in any way.