Quote from: killarich on Today at 11:31:45 AMBetter to roll with what you have for another year then to give up future high draft picks then draft a qb who is at the same level if not maybe worse than what you already haveBut that doesn't make sense when this class has been heralded for years and you don't know what is there next year. Regardless we are going to have to give up capital to get a guy, why not sooner than to continue to be horrible
Delaying the change for a year and bettering the team > drafting a failed qb and now having no assets the next few years
Quote from: Jclayton92 on Today at 09:57:37 AMI listed 1 guy yes, but you can ask a ton of guys here, there are a ton of examples of players on the line leaving and playing exceptional elsewhere that couldn't do anything here.
Quote from: katkavage on Today at 09:49:12 AMGood post. You have to assess the schedule. As of today how many teams on that schedule will the Giants be favored?
Quote from: Jclayton92 on Today at 11:29:59 AMBetter to risk it and possibly end up with Josh Allen than trotting a broken qb out for year 6, who if he gets injured at all in 2024 gets his salary guaranteed for 2025.
Quote from: DaveBrown74 on April 27, 2024, 05:00:36 PMNot trying to be negative, but none of these picks scream "steal" to me at this stage. That doesn't mean they won't end up being that, of course, but that's just how it feels at this stage.
I went with Nubin. Getting the consensus best pure safety in the draft 47th overall feels like solid value to me. He seems like a really good playmaker who may end up being better than McKinney.