How can he get the mobile App for his phone? I don't recall.
Moderation Team: Vette, babywhales, Bob In PA, gregf, bighitterdalama, beaugestus, T200
Owner: MightyGiants
MastodonThis section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote from: Ed Vette on February 15, 2024, 09:49:22 PMUnfortunately, JJ McCarthy is very difficult to get a good evaluation. It's not his fault. It was the system he was playing in where he wasn't asked to be the driver of that Offense. Sure, you can look at his mechanics and you can determine his other attributes but in very limited amount of snaps. Out of all the QB's in this draft he never stood out as a player who made huge throws or great eye popping plays.
He's going to need a team where he can sit and develop for at least one season.
There is a huge jump going from College to the NFL. He has the ability to work within a system and play in structure, so that's a big plus for him. He just hasn't been exposed to enough game situations to be a day one starter.
Perhaps he may be a good pick for the Giants since Daniel Jones will be the starter in 2024. But not at the number six pick. There are however a lot of teams looking for a QB and I don't see him falling to the second round.
There are three QBs in this draft that are at a level above the rest. That is Williams, Maye and Daniels. Those three are day one starters or close to it. Daniels will need a team where the Offense can be built around him. Same for Calib. Maye has the complete package and would thrive here in NY. Bo Nix has great talent too but even though he's the most experienced, he's a checkdowns QB too and misses opportunity downfield and when he runs, he loses sight of anything else. Penix unfortunately has that injury history. I would rule him and Daniels out for the Giants after their experience with Jones.
All of them will have an adjustment from working Under Center, to the difference in the Hash and where the ball is placed, to motion, to reading progressions, complex defenses and Clap to Cadence.
I have to say that I would be thrilled to get Maye or Daniels and if Williams gets past their mental toughness evaluation, he's a potential generational talent. I would be ok with Nix, Penix and McCarthy trading up from round two to mid first round.
Quote from: MightyGiants on March 17, 2024, 10:44:29 AM"Pushing JJ McCarthy" Seriously?Ok Rich...
This thread posed a question. There are probably a dozen or so posts on this thread that provide evidence that leads to the conclusion that he is a top-ten prospect.
As for Daniel Jones, you and other strong critics declared yourselves right because injuries are putting a premature end to his career. I am not sure what that has to do with the grief you gave people on this thread.
Despite your harsh and extreme claims to the contrary, I am not clueless about QBs.
Quote from: MightyGiants on March 17, 2024, 10:24:39 AMThere was nothing extreme about saying JJ was top ten talent. So there was absolutely no need for you to "provide balance". As for jumping on contrary opinions, just look how you went after people for saying JJ was top 10.How many posts have you put up pushing JJ McCarthy, Rich? Dozens and dozens.
Quote from: MightyGiants on March 17, 2024, 10:09:34 AMEd,Nobody is proven correct Rich. Do I need to repeat myself that it will take years to see who is correct. And again you put me in a position to provide balance here. You've done the same thing with Jones the last five years. Btw, why is it so important for you to be right that you jump on every post contrary to your opinion. Yes, it's an opinion because you're a fan just like everyone else here.
You gave the people who recognized that McCarthy was a top-10 prospect a lot of grief. Instead of acknowledging that maybe the negative comments were misguided, now you are accusing them of "gloating" and taking "victory laps" when they point out that they were proven correct.
It wouldn't hurt to simply acknowledge that some people recognized JJ's talent very early on in the process and that maybe giving them grief for doing so was ill-advised.
Quote from: Philosophers on March 17, 2024, 09:10:39 AMIn watching it, I think his description of what he sees is actually pretty good but it's the premise that showing a few misreads (even when huge plays occur) shows an inadequacy in a player is odd as a tape of mistakes can be made on every player.Every evaluation podcast does that whether it's pro or con. It's clear the person knows his xxxx, it's just limited to a few plays so it fits his narrative. It's up to the viewer to look into it further or to form an opinion off a body of work. It's good to have both posted in my opinion. Otherwise the site is viewed as slanted. Especially if one member is pushing a narrative incessantly. Thus the high amount of pages.
It's the totality that ultimately matters.
Quote from: Sem on March 16, 2024, 08:26:46 PMIs she in this, or are you thinking of Madam Secretary?oops!