Quote from: madbadger on March 08, 2024, 02:27:14 PMWell if you said it than it must be 100% true. Coaches don't make players, they can only hamper them. I remember dolts trying to claim that Belichek was the real genius not Brady. How'd that work out in the end?
So by your logic a coach-less team is ideal because nobody can get in their way? I'm glad to see that every sport in this history of sports that has coaches has gotten it wrong. Very enlightening. The 2007 Giants had a single player that made the Pro Bowl but won the Superbowl. How do you explain that?
I've always loved the revisionist history about the Patriots and Belichick/Brady as well. Tom Brady was not always Tom Brady. He was a nice player who played well within a system for the formative years of his career. The Patriots had a great defense and a team that won championships as the team was usually greater than the sum of it's parts from 2001-2006. Tom Brady has said so himself on many occasions. Belichick absolutely benefitted immensely from Brady by 2007 and beyond, and many of those teams would not have won championships without Brady at the helm.
The simple reality is that great players are more valuable than great coaches. To suggest that great coaching doesn't matter, or can't make players better is an absurd notion though.