So, everybody still want Daboll back next season?

[Ed Vette]

Surely they could find some cap space if they really wanted to right?  But it seems like they haven't made a certain amount of roster moves to avoid playing that shell game. 

He sat on his hands gambling on DJ and Gano.

[sooners56]

As a person, who strongly believes coaching doesn't mean as much as many want to believe, bringing in another head coach won't change a thing. Matter of fact nothing will change until this team drafts better players and injuries to key players  are limited.

[todge]

Add to the list of bonehead decisions- why put your offense on the field after winning the coin flip? Daboll should have deferred and put his defense on the field. Predictably they went three and out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[files58]

Good Gosh! Talk about fickle and rash...get a grip! Snap your fingers, get someone better. That should be easy for a team which has had 4 HCs and just 2 winning seasons and single (last season) PO win in a decade.

No excuses but before we cut our wrists, how about fielding a healthy starting QB behind something better than a Division 2 Oline? In any event, it shouldn't be too hard to get Joe Judge to again leave the 2-6 Patriots.

Cheers!

Not just this decade. A few weeks ago I compiled a regular season W-L record since I became a fan in 1965. They are 420-474 during that span. Despite the 4 SB's the Giants are a historically sub-500 team, and not by a little. Given all that I have seen since 65' yesterday did not shock. Daboll for 59:59 managed to bring the Giants to the brink of victory despite fielding a patchwork at best OL, and a H.S. QB. Tommy effing DeVito, a North Jersey metaphor was behind center. Brings back memories of Tom Kennedy in 66'.

[Bob In PA]

Add to the list of bonehead decisions- why put your offense on the field after winning the coin flip? Daboll should have deferred and put his defense on the field. Predictably they went three and out.

Ted: I don't precisely agree (or might agree for a different reason), but I'd like to point out the inconsistency of TRUSTING the offense in overtime after FAILING TO TRUST them to make 4th-down play and opting to kick a FG. Bob

[Bob In PA]

Not just this decade. A few weeks ago I compiled a regular season W-L record since I became a fan in 1965. They are 420-474 during that span. Despite the 4 SB's the Giants are a historically sub-500 team, and not by a little. Given all that I have seen since 65' yesterday did not shock. Daboll for 59:59 managed to bring the Giants to the brink of victory despite fielding a patchwork at best OL, and a H.S. QB. Tommy effing DeVito, a North Jersey metaphor was behind center. Brings back memories of Tom Kennedy in 66'.

files: I too am an "ancient mariner" with regard to the Giants (actually, even more "ancient").

Outside of criticizing the team owners, my only explanation is that, being the largest sports market in the NFL, the Giants have a greater interest in seeing that small sports market teams succeed (or at least continue selling a lot of hot dogs) than they do in succeeding themselves.

I am also suspicious of the draft, and whether it is TRULY random, but I'll save that for a slow day in summer... or for any Senate hearing on the NFL's monopoly.

Cha-ching!

Bob

[jgrangers2]

As a person, who strongly believes coaching doesn't mean as much as many want to believe, bringing in another head coach won't change a thing. Matter of fact nothing will change until this team drafts better players and injuries to key players  are limited.

Been beating this drum for a while. You can only smoke and mirrors your way to success for so long. At a certain point, you just have to have guys who are better than the players across from them. Judging coaches by how they manage bad teams is, to a certain extent pointless. The ability to work around an extreme lack of talent (i.e. the Giants' current offense) is admirable, but far less useful than the ability to elevate already good talent.