Ed: Do you believe your study allows us to rule out simple "bad luck" or is that still one of the options? Bob
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Jaime on February 25, 2017, 04:50:48 PM
From what I've been able to glean thus far, the Draft is deep, really deep at Corner, Running Back & DT. The hype regarding DE and TE I believe, should be tempered with the availability of the specific skill-set u r seeking. Too many of the DE's are essentially 3-4 Rush Backers. Check out How many of the TE's are oversized wide receivers? Both positions have a lot of talent, but lack the size to give us a good fit for our respective Schemes.
With the 23rd overall selection, if the best player there on the board is a Corner, we should take him and run! Can't have too many Corners, damn straight! Four WR sets aside, Think of it this way guys. A twisted knee and your Slot becomes a starter. Two Twisted knees, and your Dime becomes a starter. U can have a good front seven, but if your Corners can't cover, you got major problems in today's NFL
Quote from: todge on February 25, 2017, 11:21:02 AM
Sorry Bob but I disagree. Even though the Giants claim they use the BPA philosophy, history tells us that it is "best player at a position of need". After drafting Apple last year, I would say it is very unlikely they would use another 1st Round pick on a nickel/dime CB. That type of player might be selected in the latter Rounds. They have too many other needs to fill on this team right now than CB.
Quote from: sooners56 on February 25, 2017, 09:59:27 AM
Any chance the best player and value on the board is a CB who the Giants just have to select?
Quote from: Mikey Ravioli on January 06, 2016, 04:38:33 PM
Bill Belichick
not joking