Quote from: kingm56 on November 28, 2023, 06:37:29 AMI suspect he would improve on par with Peterson, Sanchez, Detmer, and Hoying...other QBs with physical attributes that failed under Andy Reid. The HC ability to overcome physical and mental short-comings is very limited. Even the veteran players such as Vick, Bradford, and Smith did not tangibly improve under Reids' direction. They all remained within their perspective tier groups. It's also not lost on me that prior to pairing with Patrick Mahomes, Andy Reid was considered a good coach, who couldn't win big games. Now he's considered an all-time great HC and QB whisper. It's the same paradigm as Tom Brady and Bill B, or Kelly and our own Brian Daboll. In short, I submit Andy Reid would fail to significantly alter DJ's trajectory as the QB is more important to the coach, than the coach to the QB.https://www.milehighreport.com/platform/amp/2016/4/22/11477522/veteran-nfl-qbs-who-got-better-after-changing-teams
I'd like to pose the following question to anyone who cares to answer: why do fans believe coaching can tangibility alter a veteran players' trajectory, when 99.9% of the data proves it's unlikely? I can't think of a single example of a below average QB, who started 60 games, that was transformed into a sustained above average/PB starter, simply by changing coaches. Yet, we continue to talk about coaching and 'the system' as if they make tangible differences on veteran QB's careers. Why? I think fans overcomplicate football; coaching is not the impetus for DJ failures, he's failing because he lacks the attributes to succeed. As JC stated, he just not very good. IMO, it really is that simple.