Big Blue Huddle

Medical experts at NIH, Harvard, etc., are saying that Omicron will affect the vaccinated versus unvaccinated very differently with the former being much less likely to get it and if they get it, for it to be most likely very, very mild whereas the latter have a much higher risk of getting it and if they get it, of having much more serious effects from it.

Is the point of this message to just let it run rampant because it is milder than Delta and will lead to more herd immunity?  If that's the message, the research experts are saying it will lead to more serious cases for those who have not yet been vaccinated.

The result will be two different outcomes for different pools of the population.

My name is Joseph.

Also, I am not a philosopher in any sense but have always been enjoyed reading from the great philosophers throughout history.  That's why my board username is plural to show them, not me.

Quote from: Slugs Narrows on July 23, 2021, 02:05:45 PM
Here is an honest question I know most here won

I get really tired of the argument, "personal freedom and choice matters most."  We live in a society and as such, we need to follow logical rules to co-exist.  I hate what I call the affluent hippie Marin County argument anti-vaccination folks saying kids get too many vaccinations which they think is risky, yet they want them to interact with society.  Sorry they can't have it both ways.  If they want to be part of society, they need to get vaccinated.  If they don't want to get them vaccinated, then let them create their own self-isolated society.

Same with Anti-Covid vaccine folks.  We live in a shared society.  We need to work together to protect each other.  The numbers are so overwhelmingly clear that anti-vaccine folks are the vast, vast majority (something between 95% - 99%) of those getting Covid now and the highly risky Delta variant and causing these spikes.  Personal freedom?  Think the vaccine is risky yet you may drink alcohol, eat unhealthy food, smoke cigarettes yet those are ok?  Give me a break.  Get the damn shot and think of others before yourself.  Sorry to all for this rant.

Quote from: MightyGiants on May 16, 2021, 10:25:51 AM
I was curious how this particular crisis got started.  I had to look it up.   In case you're like me, here is a good primer


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/explainer-how-did-latest-israeli-palestinian-crisis-emerge-n1267399

It started literally with the cutting of an electrical cord so the loudspeaker for Muslim prayer prior ot Ramadan could not be broadcast over Netanyahu's speech at the nearby Western Wall.  Police just walked into Al Aksa Mosque and cut it. 

I've spent a lot of time over there the past three years.  There is so much to love about it.  Tel Aviv may have the best food scene in the world.  All the people I've met from all sides have been wonderful.  There is an energy there that makes you feel alive.  It is horrible what is going on, however, there are so many dynamics at play there that it is a very complicated problem with no easy solution in sight.  Also, it is much more than a Jewish vs. Palestinean problem.

I hope peace comes to all there soon.

The U.S. is becoming increasingly browner in terms of ethnic makeup and today

Quote from: Bob In PA on April 06, 2021, 01:11:55 PM
Phil: I know, but the worst that can happen with a voter ID is someone votes instead of you. 

One example of bad that can happen if someone hacks into a national health database is this: I announce I'm running for President. You hack into my records and discover that I had a certain type of hepatitis.

You put an ad on the TV stating that I'm a slime-bucket who probably used a dirty needle injecting illegal drugs and got hepatitis.  Now I have to explain away your accusation, regardless of whether it's true or false.

Bob

Someone can hack into a voter registration system and steal confidential personal info about a person.  Again, in your example, you have to trust that the system will prevail and that in the end it makes the lives of everyone better.  Yoru example is pretty extreme and if you are worried about extremes, then I think it crosses over to the unrealistic and becomes paranoia instead.  Do you know how much redundant medical costs there are because a doctor say in an Urgent Care examines you and takes an X ray and says you may have a crack in a bone in say your elbow joint, then you go to a major medical center like the Cleveland Clinic to meet with an orthopedic specialist and he does not have your X ray so he has to take another one. 

Quote from: Bob In PA on April 06, 2021, 12:48:35 PM
Phil: I don't think assigning each person registered with Social Security Administration a separate Voter ID number would have any of the problems you just outlined.  If you think of one, write back. 

Such numbers would be as "confidential" as the Social Security number each person already has.... one per person.... i.e., one man, one vote.

Knowing a person's Voter ID number would not have the privacy ramifications as snooping into a person's health records.  This, I think, is what people don't like about a national health database.

Bob

I agree 100% with you about that Bob, but that should also apply to national registration of medical info.  You can't trust one but not trust the other.  We have to trust it will remain confidential and not be used harmfully against them.   

Quote from: Ed Vette on April 06, 2021, 12:02:10 PM
Ok I can understand that thinking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

At the end of the day, it's about trust and many in today's Right do not trust.  The Right which is predominantly white middle/upper middle class think for example that they will lose out in their way of life to immigrants.  It is not a new theme.  The Capital Riots are not new to American History.  In the 1840s, native Protestants rioted against Irish Catholic immigrants.  In the early 1900s, the KKK rioted against Italian Catholics.  I was in a Starbucks in Savannah, Georgia one day a few years ago.  Two young adults, probably in their early 20s (man and woman) came in to get a cup of coffee and each was carrying a pistol strapped to their waist.  I went up to them and asked them why they felt the need to wear those guns inside the Starbucks.  They told me that they didn't trust if there was some sort of crime that they would be protected by the police or anyone so they were taking matters into their own hands.  That example perfectly describes the lack of trust among a huge segment of the population.  It's a genuine paranoia but it's a real problem.  Same thing with not trusting U.S. Government "databases."  They simply don't trust.   

Quote from: Ed Vette on April 06, 2021, 11:08:55 AM
Why would it be DOA? I'm a former Republican too now Independent although I have never voted down a party line.

I do not believe they would trust a national registration system because in general today's Right simply does not trust the actions of a government.  They'll think the Government will use this information in some insidious way against them.  It's the same reason, they didn't trust a national databank for individual healthcare information so all the patients have their medical history/info stored in one vast place that can be accessed by doctors when needed to evaluate a patient.  Think about how much easier that would be if you go to one physicial specialist not affiliated with say the doctor's you normally go to so he has no ability to see past X rays, MRIs, histories of physicals, etc.  All he can do is ask you questions unless you brought all that info which 99% of patients don't personally have.

Racism whether overt or subtle is insidious.  If a white person

Quote from: Bob In PA on April 05, 2021, 02:52:39 PM
Phil: Most politicians are only smart about 1 of these 2 things: leaders know how to raise money... followers know how to keep their mouths shut and do what they're told by leaders (so you get unqualified people).

There is a "lunatic fringe" in both political parties.  Sadly, it seems they have a lot of time (and money) on their hands, so politicians will do almost anything to get their grubby paws on all that money. 

Politicians love rile people up about the lunatics in the other party because then they don't have to tell you what they stand FOR (vote for me, not because I'm good/smart, but because the other guy is bad/dumb). 

Bob

FYI - I am not a lifelong Dem and have voted more Repub than Dem in my life.  That said, I don't see the similarity in "lunatic fringe" across both parties.  On the Dems side, I disagree vociferously with AOC as I think she's a young millennial who has zero clue about what it takes to be effective in Congress and her only skill to date is saying what's wrong.  I disagree with her and Bernie Sanders but that is a disagreement on policy.  That's a far cry from Marjorie Taylor Greene and her crazy theories or Lauren Bobert and her nonsense.  I am not aware of anyone on the Dems side preaching lasers from space though I could be wrong.  One thing I do believe in which is wrong on both parties is that power corrupts and I think either side can have members who break laws or let their power go to their heads or want to be President. 

Quote from: Bob In PA on April 05, 2021, 02:15:54 PM
Phil: You "pre-answered" essentially the same question that I just directed to Larry (Painter).

It's interesting to me that we have at least two people here who went in that direction as they got older.

In your case it seems mostly it was your stance on the issues that changed (but also a like or dislike for various candidates).

Bob

Bob - I'm a giant believer that national public policy is extremely complicated so we need first and foremost really smart people in Congress.  Second, we need people whose motivation is serving the public and caring about the best interests of the U.S. and for humanity as well and not looking first and foremost at building their personal brande or someone whose only skill is saying everything is wrong or having beliefs that border on crazy.  I simply don't understand how anyone thinks some of these candidates are qualified.

When a conservative Republican in 1982 said, "Communism is a global threat" I felt you could agree or disagree with it, but even if you disagreed with it, you didn't think the person was crazy for thinking it as it was only a difference of opinion.  Now, it's I believe this but the other side believes in global cabal of Satan worshipping pedophiles is nuts.

Quote from: Slugs Narrows on April 05, 2021, 02:05:17 PM
The other side has similar issues.  JFK wouldn