Quote from: katkavage on Today at 04:42:37 PMI've never seen a correlation between the play at the end of one year and what happens the following year. Means nothing.Unlike the 2022 Giants and the 2023 Giants.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: katkavage on Today at 04:42:37 PMI've never seen a correlation between the play at the end of one year and what happens the following year. Means nothing.Unlike the 2022 Giants and the 2023 Giants.
Quote from: brownelvis54 on May 01, 2024, 09:29:29 PMOur QB room looks pretty bleakThere could be some cause for optimism. It was reported that Lock wasn't serious enough about putting in the work t get to the next level but last year there was marked improvement. Maybe Daboll saw something in him. For sure he would drive the ball downfield.
Jones: two neck surgeries and an ACL
Drew Lock who couldnt beat out Teddy Bridgwater and Gino Smith (twice)
Cutlets, enough said
Quote from: DaveBrown74 on May 01, 2024, 07:44:25 PMI still am not even sure what this one was about.The board game
Strands #59
"A token of our appreciation"
💡🔵💡🔵
🔵🔵💡🔵
💡🔵🟡
Quote from: MightyGiants on May 01, 2024, 07:01:19 PMand @Jclayton92His play declined years ago and when I said it, I got pushback here. It was a stupid transaction. Diva.
The NFL Players Association told the Denver Broncos in a November letter that their threat to bench quarterback Russell Wilson if he refused to alter an injury guarantee in his contract was illegal, violated the CBA and could result in legal action against the team, a league source confirmed to The Athletic.
https://theathletic.com/5171778/2023/12/31/broncos-russell-wilson-nflpa/
The letter, sent by a law firm on behalf of the NFLPA and first reported by the Washington Post, said that if the Broncos "follow through on the Club's threat, the Club will violate, among other things, the Collective Bargaining Agreement, Mr. Wilson's Player Contract and New York law."
The letter added that Wilson and the NFLPA "reasonably anticipate arbitration and/or litigation against the Broncos."
The Broncos did not bench Wilson in the aftermath of the meeting about his contract. The 35-year-old veteran started the next seven games, the last of which was a 26-23 loss to the New England Patriots on Christmas Eve that put Denver's playoff hopes in peril.
On Wednesday, the team announced Stidham would start the final two games. Coach Sean Payton, who said Friday he was "not privy" to discussions about Wilson's contract between the quarterback and the team, said the decision was made solely for football reasons after a four-game stretch in which the Broncos went 1-3 and Wilson's play declined.
Quote from: Jclayton92 on May 01, 2024, 05:09:34 PMThey tried to get him to waive it but he declined so they sat him."It's not personal, it's business."
Quote from: MightyGiants on May 01, 2024, 02:01:57 PM@Jclayton92 and @Ed VetteYou view sitting him after an injury as forcing him to renegotiate his injury clause? That would be up to him and his Agent to bring that up.
How would agents view Schoen if he tried to force a renegotiation of an injury guarantee? While I have seen players be asked to take pay cuts or be cut, I have not witnessed a team try to renegotiate a guarantee. There seems to be an unwritten rule (I am not fully versed; it might even be a written rule) that guarantees money in contracts.
Do you think that might hurt Schoen in future contract negotiations?
Quote from: Jclayton92 on May 01, 2024, 10:46:49 AMI think the organization would be negligent if they see he is still seeing ghosts to allow him back out there to run into defensive linemen. Yes all of his sacks aren't on him but he didn't help the situation either.Playing is in his best interest. It's his opportunity to retain his position with the Giants or to audition for his next team by way of trade or cut. That's a good reason to waive or renegotiate that injury clause. That clause should have had a reduction built into it over the life of the contract. It should be reduced by 25% entering year two.
I would be perfectly content with them wrapping him in bubble wrap and placing him at the end of the bench. Then telling him if he wants to play he's welcome to waive the injury clause, if not enjoy your 🍿.