Big Blue Huddle

The Detroit Franchise can't seem to get it all together. Stupid contract for a journeyman QB who will never get them to the trophy. They would have been much better off building a team around Matt Stafford.

Quote from: Ed Vette on Today at 05:27:50 PMI find it interesting how on one grid you can find it easily and I can't, while the opposite happens for me. This one just clicked for me.

Agreed. I got the first one no problem and then just struggled after that. I agree that we sometimes differ in which ones we find easy versus hard.

Quote from: DaveBrown74 on Today at 05:04:06 PMJust didn't have it today.

Connections
Puzzle #337
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟦🟩
🟩🟩🟦🟩
🟦🟦🟦🟪
🟦🟪🟪🟦

I find it interesting how on one grid you can find it easily and I can't, while the opposite happens for me. This one just clicked for me.

Mixed feelings about this deal.

On the one hand, it's hard to fault the Lions in any way for wanting to keep what they have built going. This is basically the worst or second worst franchise of all time that is still in existence today, and all of a sudden they're one of the best teams in the league. Goff is at least top 10 (if not top 5) in all the key statistics except QBR, where he is 11th. The guy is very clear a top 10 QB on paper.

On the other hand, one can reasonably question whether Goff is legitimately a top 10 QB in a vacuum. The Lions have one of the best if not the best situations for a QB in the league (elite O line and premium weapons all over the place plus a very good playcaller last year). The Rams have also been down this road with Goff, paying him very well, and they then wanted out of that very quickly to bring in Stafford, with whom they immediately won a SB after coming up a bit short with Goff. I think it is fair to say that the Rams are a very smart franchise. Did the Lions pay elite QB money to a good but not elite QB? I think that's very possible.

Tough one. I'm curious what others think. I can't fault them for doing what they have done, but I can't say for sure if it was a great move. I just don't view Goff the way I do Mahomes, Burrow, Allen, etc talent-wise. That said I can't really argue too much with the decision either, all things considered.

Now that Goff got his new contact

https://x.com/the33rdteamfb/status/1790124808077779248?s=46&t=1vcQIN8GqF5J2oLdxEVEJQ

https://x.com/adamschefter/status/1790119575582917024?s=46&t=1vcQIN8GqF5J2oLdxEVEJQ

Just didn't have it today.

Connections
Puzzle #337
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟦🟩
🟩🟩🟦🟩
🟦🟦🟦🟪
🟦🟪🟪🟦

Bellinger didn't have as much a drop off as his role simply changed. Because of Waller he lost reps. Because of the oline he was asked to be primarily a blocker. When the ball was thrown to him he caught it. Did his job just fine.

Quote from: uconnjack8 on Today at 02:24:21 PMLarry,

That's one of the reasons I wish they would have graded the front 7 as a group and not had Burns and Thibodeaux as OLBs.  Seems like they used "base" defense lineups to grade this even though teams are in "base" less than 30% of the time. 

I all comes down to positional responsibilities. The 3/4 Mike has more coverage responsibilities and the 3/4 Edge do not. That's why I separate the LB's from the DLine. I am curious if Thibs and Burn have the sand in their pants to transition to DE responsibility. If so, the Giants are a 3 Tech away. Simmons would be my Will and McFadden my Sam.

Quote from: MightyGiants on May 12, 2024, 09:33:44 AMI wouldn't think you would consider this a Daniel Jones issue because Bellinger shined with DJ as QB in 2022.  That was until he sustained a serious eye injury.  Bellinger never was the same when he returned from that injury in 2022 and didn't regain his rookie magic in 2023

I wonder if the damage was mental as well as physical. Could he be playing scared?