Ralph is one of the better-connected beat reporters. The article is well worth the read
https://www.foxsports.com/stories/nfl/how-strong-is-giants-faith-in-daniel-jones-examining-new-yorks-qb-plans
Rich: I do believe Schoen is trying to have it both ways, because THAT'S HIS JOB and you always have to plan for contingencies (and, as you pointed out elsewhere, it's "due diligence").
What Ralph glosses over and fails to adequately account for is the comment near the beginning of the article is to explain that the time when Schoen said (paraphrasing) the Giants need to address the QB position came BEFORE they signed Lock.
Is that not "addressing" the QB position? Ralph doesn't say, which means IMO it's safe to ignore the rest of the article inasmuch as it's crucial to viewing what he starts the article with in the proper context (noting that the Giants have gone "in-depth" on studying the best college QB's).
Bob