News:

Moderation Team: Vette, babywhales, Bob In PA, gregf, bighitterdalama, beaugestus, T200

Owner: MightyGiants

Link To Live Chat

Mastodon

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - killarich

#16
Wanted Fiske or a DT .... Wouldn't mind Melton from Rutgers to play corner at this point
#17
I hate the eagles man ... scummiest organization out there
#18
Quote from: Jclayton92 on April 26, 2024, 07:50:19 PMWow Philly retooled their whole secondary in 2 rounds

Who did they get ... I'm not seeing it yet
#19
WFT traded with Eagles ? You have no self respect !!
#20
Quote from: MightyGiants on April 26, 2024, 07:47:47 PMWith the Giants original 2nd round pick, the Panthers trade it to the Rams and the Rams take


https://x.com/AlbertBreer/status/1784005995456237654

F*** Rams you disgusting ****

Damn wanted Fiske
#21
Quote from: jgrangers2 on April 25, 2024, 10:52:49 PMDT Braden Fiske, DT Kris Jenkins, CB Max Melton and CB Mike Sainristil are a few of the guys I like at 47

I would like Friske as well
#22
Big Blue Huddle / Re: Where does this leave Slayton?
April 26, 2024, 10:00:36 AM
Think anyone would give a second rounder for Slayton ? lol

I like the dude but I want the team to get a beefy DT and Corner
#23
I want a beefy DT or secondary
#24
Quote from: H-Town G-Fan on April 25, 2024, 10:02:11 PMI love how the pick of the top WR on the board instead of the 4th QB is a jumping off point for (unnecessary, unprompted) Jones defense. Wild.

No you are making a false narrative out of it

You say you are done discussing this but here you are trying to get the last word

one again it is FACT if the Giants were DONE with Jones they would have taken one fo the 2nd tier QBs in this draft regardless of who is available at WR


they did in FACT view #1 WR as  bigger need then moving on from Jones considering the top 3QBs were gone


You are trying to throw this Jones narrative on a wall and hoping it sticks .... did Giants want ti IMPROVE over Jones yes probably most likely

are they DONE with Jones ? No they obviously arent
#25
Quote from: H-Town G-Fan on April 25, 2024, 09:47:43 PMHonestly, this is pedantic waffling around the term "done with" for no real purpose. So I am, actually, done with discussing it.

FACT is they viewed lack of WR #1 as more of a need then Jones being at QB

I get your point about after next season ..... but this is literally factual at this point
#26
My god.... is their a chance we get a first round level defensive player in the 2nd round the way things are going ?
#27
Quote from: H-Town G-Fan on April 25, 2024, 09:42:53 PMAnd when DJ is cut after this season, will you admit the Giants were "completely done" with him but for considerations having nothing to do with his talents? He's still on the team because of cap considerations. You appear to be declaring victory on DJ's behalf--why I don't know--because the Giants didn't draft the 4th QB at 6, a move that would be a disproportionate utilization of valuable draft capital.

I literally haven't criticized DJ at all in this thread, just noted that the pick of a WR is not confirmation of faith in him. But the defensiveness of DJ against logic is clear.

Yes ....they will be DONE after next season if that is the case

RIGHT NOW they are not

Did they try to improve at QB ?? Probably yes most likely ....BUT  they are not DONE at the moment ...if they were you simply take the franchise QB


they believed none of these QB's outside the top 3 are that


so no they are not done with Jones
#28
Quote from: Jclayton92 on April 25, 2024, 09:38:45 PMDid I say there were? I was simply talking to mad about the 3 prospects he mentioned as it refers to next year.


Ok but your point leads to the fact that next years prospects at THIS moment are on the level of the 2nd tier of QBs in this draft


They have a whole season to prove themselves better or worse than that

Which makes taking Nabers the smart move ......

Because if we stink it up again and pick top 5 we now get the chance to pick a JJ type QB next season or who knows a better QB to pair with Nabers

vs

Picking JJ risking a bust and still not having a #1 WR
#29
Quote from: sxdxca38 on April 25, 2024, 09:34:07 PMHi,

No but if they thought JJ or Penix were superior and potential franchise QB's they would have taken them, but they didn't they passed at #6, why?

You don't pass on a potential franchise QB if you are absolutely done with Daniel Jones as Rich Eisen pontificated all over the internet about 4-6 weeks ago.

The man was completely wrong and mislead a lot of viewers and Giant fans.

If you don't like DJ then that is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

I on the other hand feel with an adequate O line, a #1 explosive WR, and an slightly easier schedule, I believe DJ will have a bounce back year.

Enjoy




Exactly... the first 3 QBs ...SURE


But JJ and/or Penix were obviously not viewed that highly
#30
Quote from: Jclayton92 on April 25, 2024, 09:31:50 PMAll three have significantly more flaws than the prospects that were taken 1-3. They would have likely been qbs 7, 8, 9 in this draft. Will they go 1st next year possibly but the talent is nowhere near the guys that came out this year unless they take significant steps.

Okay but we were NOT getting QB's 1-3 .....

So this makes Nabers even more genius