What I suspected..Vikings all in for a qb..probably JJ. Giants can't compete with the Norse ammo and shouldn't trade up. Jim Boy wants to stockpile young, cheap talent.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Gmo11 on March 15, 2024, 12:23:18 AMI don't know that it really impacts the Giants all that much. The first 3 picks are going to be QBs in some order. Arizona and SD are going forward with their QBs so they weren't taking QB4. And everyone knows the Giants will likely take QB4. So unless you think this makes SD less likely to trade that pick this trade does not have much of an impact towards the Giants.
What does seem to be the case is that without a trade this draft should go
QB
QB
QB
WR
WR
Which means the Giants get left with either the 4th QB or the 3rd WR. Not ideal.
Quote from: AYM on March 14, 2024, 11:29:11 PMWhy this is huge for the Giants:
With Arizona trading Rondale Moore, and San Diego losing both WRs, WR is a huge need for both of them, increasing the likelihood that at least one of those big 4 QBs will be there at #6.
And if it's not a QB that Schoen or Daboll like, someone likely will, meaning we could flip the pick.
Quote from: brownelvis54 on March 13, 2024, 01:55:59 PMI would be pissed....giving up all that draft capital?? Just take Malik Nabers or Rome Odunze at #6
Quote from: londonblue on March 13, 2024, 06:16:56 AMHunter does not quite have Burns A+ speed/bend but is a much more rounded player with better hand use, more power and better edge set vs. run. He is also 4 years older and had more injuries.
Right now Hunter is the better player. In two or three years time that might look different. Burns has been acquired as a foundational piece. Hunter would be more of a bridge.