Quote from: Philosophers on February 06, 2024, 10:50:02 AMCan Isaiah Simmons be an effective edge pass ruaher from 9 tech spot given how fast he is?
He might also be a good safety option when they go nickel or dime packages
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Philosophers on February 06, 2024, 10:50:02 AMCan Isaiah Simmons be an effective edge pass ruaher from 9 tech spot given how fast he is?
Quote from: Philosophers on February 06, 2024, 10:34:41 AMSo what kind of defensive players will we need to add to make Bowen's 3-4 effective? Since he blitzes less and wants his DL/edge olayers to generate the rush, U think we will need a good 3 tech DT who can win at LOS and rush as well as stop the run. Believe we may also need to find another LB.
Quote from: H-Town G-Fan on February 06, 2024, 12:53:44 AMWhat evidence is there that Vrabel micromanaged him? I don't know where this notion that Vrabel himself is/was a defensive guru comes from. His sole season as a defensive play caller saw his Texans defense as league worst in scoring. Maybe Bowen was an alright coordinator in spite of Vrabel? If Vrabel was such a a great coach (with a barely .500 career record) why is he unemployed?
To be clear, I don't really care about the Bowen hire. I think the Giants played it relatively safe. But you could have said the same thing about the Wink hire and now people are bemoaning his departure. Simple facts are Bowen has piloted top defenses in the past. Quite possible he fails, but I don't get the reckless negativity.
Quote from: T200 on February 06, 2024, 09:11:00 AMUnderstood, Rich. I was just saying that many of the college players who make it to the NFL will be better, thus making the NFL product better. My comment was more about delaying the talent from college to the NFL, versus losing it, as you mentioned. To me, staying in college speaks more to the quality and productivity, not longevity.
Quote from: T200 on February 06, 2024, 09:02:06 AMIs it lost or delayed?
I think it's a good idea for players to finish their 4 years. Many don't because they're chasing the professional dollars. If they can get money in college, they're more likely to stay and finish their degrees. This sets them up for life after football.
The extra year or two of growth, development, and maturity is only going to help the NFL product, not hurt it. That's my take on it.
Quote from: T200 on February 06, 2024, 08:52:36 AMI think there's a QB in this draft that Schoen and Daboll want to see in Blue. I also think they will do everything reasonable to get him. If he's not available, I don't think they will draft a QB just to have one.
Quote from: TDToomer on February 06, 2024, 08:47:23 AMAsk the same question to DLaw and Thomas who will wind up with longer careers with the Giants when it is all set and done.
Quote from: TDToomer on February 06, 2024, 08:42:56 AMNot true. The college players are more prepared and ready for the pros and still are subject to the same rookie cap. They are just delaying their big free agency payout by a year. The talent pool will catch up. Why do you want unprepared juniors declaring just because their families are broke under the old system prior to the NIL?
Quote from: Gman329 on February 06, 2024, 08:40:30 AMI involuntarily cringed and groaned when I hit this one. "Bend but don't break" is right up there with "prevent" in my list of things I hate. DBs giving 10 yard cushions on 3rd and 7 and we spend all year hoping to "hold them to three". Great.
Quote from: DaveBrown74 on February 05, 2024, 09:13:07 PMBut zero good ones.