Quote from: DaveBrown74 on June 30, 2022, 10:12:01 AMGreat stuff Ed, as usual, and thanks for sharing that video. I will be watching it later for sure.
The owl theory definitely "sounds crazy", but when it is really presented it does seem like enough to raise reasonable doubt. The fact that she had owl feathers/fibers on her person is huge IMO. Unless you think Peterson carefully put them there somehow, which seems far-fetched to me, then why were they there if she wasn't attacked? Again, it's enough to raise reasonable doubt, which is all they needed to do.
I agree that the blowpoke theory doesn't add up.
I also think the statement that Peterson's motive was that his wife found out about his gay life and flipped out, so he killed her, is highly speculative and there is no real evidence of that. It is a viable theory, but it is not fact and hence does not really contribute to proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Bottom line I agree this guy was sent to jail after not receiving a fair trial. And while he may have murdered his wife (I really don't know), there was enough reasonable doubt there for an acquittal in my opinion.
That's exactly how I see it, Dave.