Thanks for the FB video! With no cable I don't get much of anything here in the country. The only thing we really have is Netflix
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: JimboWHO on June 01, 2012, 01:52:53 PMQuote from: madbadger on June 01, 2012, 01:17:18 PM
You guys realize that Lincoln was, for all intents and purposes, a tyrant. He saved the union and freed the slaves but he also stripped American citizens of their right to Habeus Corpus which allowed him to hold critics of his administration without due process. He also stripped some American citizens of their right to a jury trial and replaced it with military tribunals. Often those tribunals were so stacked in the governments favor that the defendant had no chance of being exonerated. Hundreds of citizens were sent to their deaths at the hands of those tribunals.
Lincoln was a complex man, both good and bad, but there is no way that a man who shredded the bill of rights and repudiated the ideas espoused in the Declaration of Independence should go down as our greatest President. I'd take Jefferson, Washington, Adams, Teddy Rex, Truman and Reagan before I'd even begin to consider where to place Lincoln.
The citizens' right to habeas corpus was protected but for the existence of a rebellion - the language in the Constitution was clear. Lincoln relied upon that language and the fact that the fate of the U.S. hung in the balance. The laws of war are different and the president-commander in chief must be allowed extraordinary latitude to interpret and use these laws as he sees fit. This is how Lincoln, correctly it turns out, saw it.
We're talking about the bloodiest conflict this country ever fought, with outright rebellion in several key states. Expecting some perfect human rights track record during what was likely the first incident of total war is naive.
JJM