Malik Nabers is NOT happy

[coggs]

He's the guy with the ball in his hands, wise ass.

Oh please.  That guy does not have any standing to have a chat with anyone. 

[Ed Vette]

Oh please.  That guy does not have any standing to have a chat with anyone. 

What's your purpose around here anyway? You don't start threads. You just like to lurk and find fault with any post you can. You contribute nothing. Really easy isn't it?

[coggs]

What's your purpose around here anyway? You don't start threads. You just like to lurk and find fault with any post you can. You contribute nothing. Really easy isn't it?

Why do I need to start threads?  Your post about DeVito having a chat with Nabers is nuts.  If you think I contribute nothing put me on ignore or dont get your panties twisted when someone disagrees with you.  DeVito has to worry about his own game, and there is way too much keeping him occupied there before he can think about having a chat with the best player on the offense.

[Ed Vette]

Why do I need to start threads?  Your post about DeVito having a chat with Nabers is nuts.  If you think I contribute nothing put me on ignore or dont get your panties twisted when someone disagrees with you.  DeVito has to worry about his own game, and there is way too much keeping him occupied there before he can think about having a chat with the best player on the offense.

You're act is old and tired. You want to disagree, do it without being a wise ass. Trust me nobody will miss you here.

[TDToomer]

You're act is old and tired. You want to disagree, do it without being a wise ass. Trust me nobody will miss you here.

You don't speak for everyone Ed. I think Coggs makes good points and should not be shouted down and censored. Chasing people away for this forum is not a good look. And why does he need to start anymore thread than we already have? Look at the first page on a Monday. Why would we need more threads with 4-5 responses when there are already good active 3-8 page discussions?