Agree or Disagree?

[MightyGiants]

That's your personal opinion and that's fine. There's no coherent evidence to support it.

Your fact-free claim (while lacking in supporting evidence or reason) is duly noted. 

If you would like to share an example of a QB that succeeded with a 32nd ranked pass protection and 32nd ranked receivers I am more than willing to listen

[Doc16LT56]

Your fact-free claim (while lacking in supporting evidence or reason) is duly noted. 

A receiving corp is by definition advantaged or disadvantaged by the QB throwing to them. Your attempt to separate the two is your personal opinion, not evidence. Thought that would be obvious to you.

[Doc16LT56]

When we're quibbling between 32nd ranked and 30th ranked, we're just wasting time.

[uconnjack8]

I agree OL is the biggest need outside of QB. 

[MightyGiants]

A receiving corp is by definition advantaged or disadvantaged by the QB throwing to them. Your attempt to separate the two is your personal opinion, not evidence. Thought that would be obvious to you.

I am still waiting for you to provide that example of a QB being successful with the worst-ranked pass protection and receivers.

The NFL has been around for nearly 100 years.  So if my personal opinion was baseless (as you claimed) you should be able to easily demonstrate it.

[LennG]

Not to include QB in the listing is not right as that is our biggest need by far. Yes, we need help on the OL but we have spent so many high draft picks on this that it seems to get boring that we just can't find some talent in round 2 or 3. Come on, we have 2 #2 picks and use them both for the OL.
After that, we need another pass2 rusher in the worst way.

[uconnjack8]

Not to include QB in the listing is not right as that is our biggest need by far. Yes, we need help on the OL but we have spent so many high draft picks on this that it seems to get boring that we just can't find some talent in round 2 or 3. Come on, we have 2 #2 picks and use them both for the OL.
After that, we need another pass2 rusher in the worst way.

I think the purpose was to remove that to see what other need people considered the biggest.

[Bob In PA]

A receiving corp is by definition advantaged or disadvantaged by the QB throwing to them. Your attempt to separate the two is your personal opinion, not evidence. Thought that would be obvious to you.

Doc: I agree with Rich's view but also agree with you that there is no way to prove it. It's just a hunch. Bob

[Ed Vette]

Doc: I agree with Rich's view but also agree with you that there is no way to prove it. It's just a hunch. Bob

[T200]

Not to include QB in the listing is not right as that is our biggest need by far. Yes, we need help on the OL but we have spent so many high draft picks on this that it seems to get boring that we just can't find some talent in round 2 or 3. Come on, we have 2 #2 picks and use them both for the OL.
After that, we need another pass2 rusher in the worst way.

I think the purpose of not listing the QB is because it's universally known and accepted that QB is our top need. It's almost like saying, "Outside of BLUE, what color is most prominent in the NY Giants?"

[LennG]

I think the purpose of not listing the QB is because it's universally known and accepted that QB is our top need. It's almost like saying, "Outside of BLUE, what color is most prominent in the NY Giants?"

Red

[T200]

Red

Offensive line 

[andrew_nyGiants]

You can never have enough edge rushers. That's my pick.
Want to improve the OL? Start with the coach.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Jclayton92]

Disagree. It's DE/DT. They have to replace Leo.

I was going to say this as well, DE/DT or a linebacker like Chop Roninson to play opposite Thibs.

The Oline and weapons will be significantly better with a competent Qb which means the Defense needs the love.

[sooners56]

So not many believe an ELITE WR is needed more than Oline? The Oline already has three very high draft picks. Coaching may be more of an issue than the talent of the olineman.