Former GM Mike Tannenbaum suggest QB trade for NYG

[madbadger]

As @madbadger mentioned I am not sure if this is really true.  You have Christian Peters, Kerry Collins (who was damaged goods when the Giants signed him), Jay Feely, Ahmad Bradshaw (who eventually served time for theft), and LT (I suspect I have forgotten a few).

Dave Meggette was an absolute degenerate when he played for the Giants but most of his behavior went unnoticed by the public until he got to New England. I have a hard time believing that the Mara's were unaware of his character deficits.

[Jclayton92]

https://www.si.com/nfl/giants/big-blue-plus/new-york-giants-daniel-jones-brian-daboll

Didn't want to start a new thread just for it but a really good article explaining why the Giants have to get a Qb this offseason.

[ozzie]

Click bait and nothing more in my opinion

[LennG]

They have Joe Flacco and would get Daniel Jones (who likely do much better with the far more talented Browns team).  They might prefer to run with Flacco and get out from under the Watson deal.

Why would you think Jones would do better on any other team? How many coaches has he had and Jones is still Jones. Yes he may put up better numbers and a few more wins but he is and always will be just an average QB and nothing will change that.

[Philosophers]

History would suggest that you aren't correct that he isn't Giants material. The Mara's gave Christian Peters an opportunity when it was well known that he had been accused of multiple rapes while at Nebraska. I'm not interested in Watson but the Mara's aren't as strait laced as they pretend to be.

Your point is right, but look at the players they made exceptions to.  Generally late round draft picks, low cost positions or a player coming back from redemption signed at a lower cost.  I don't think they've taken a big ticket flier on a player with some issues.  With Watson, they'd be on the hook for a lot of money.  I don't think that's their type of gamble.  I may be wrong.

[Brooklyn Dave]

Forget all the other bull, I would take Fields for a #2 pick straight up.

So would I

[DaveBrown74]

For those who want to trade for Fields: would you exercise his fifth year option in this offseason? You'd be required to make that decision now. That would mean you'd be locking yourself in for about $20mm fully guaranteed for 2025.

[MightyGiants]

For those who want to trade for Fields: would you exercise his fifth year option in this offseason? You'd be required to make that decision now. That would mean you'd be locking yourself in for about $20mm fully guaranteed for 2025.

[madbadger]

For those who want to trade for Fields: would you exercise his fifth year option in this offseason? You'd be required to make that decision now. That would mean you'd be locking yourself in for about $20mm fully guaranteed for 2025.

Why would anyone here want a younger version of Daniel Jones? Besides with Jones cap situation no one is going to trade for him and cutting him is out of the question leaving us with two guys who can run but are below average as passers.

[Ed Vette]

As @madbadger mentioned I am not sure if this is really true.  You have Christian Peters, Kerry Collins (who was damaged goods when the Giants signed him), Jay Feely, Ahmad Bradshaw (who eventually served time for theft), and LT (I suspect I have forgotten a few).

Josh Brown would disagree.

[kartanoman]

Josh Brown would disagree.

Not to mention Zeke Mowatt and Mark Ingram

[Giant Obsession]

Forget all the other bull, I would take Fields for a #2 pick straight up.

The ONLY QB I see out there worth acquiring is Fields. That includes college and available NFL quarterback.

The number 6 pick and not much else should be doable.  Or you can give them Daniel Jones also, but U doubt Chicago like the rest of the NFL is that dumb.  He is our 40 million dollar albatross for this coming season.

[nb587]

Actually, if the Giants were to trade for Watson, they would be on the hook for $46 million (his guaranteed base salary) for the next three seasons.   The Browns own the rest because they did some bonuses.  If the Giants were to trade away Jones they would save nearly $14 million in cap space (with a $33 million dead cap charge).

If the Giants made the trade and cut Watson after a year, would they be on the hook for $46 m for the next 2 years?

[MightyGiants]

If the Giants made the trade and cut Watson after a year, would they be on the hook for $46 m for the next 2 years?

3 seasons

[nb587]

3 seasons

If I thought Watson had much left in the tank, it might be worth it.  That 2nd round pick is appealing but that's too expensive.