Former GM Mike Tannenbaum suggest QB trade for NYG

[AYM]

Watson is a terrible QB at this point, so at least on field, I'm not sure swapping Jones for him gets us anywhere.

Then there's the contract and the off field stuff.

If this trade were to really go down, I'd want at least 2 #1 picks from Cleveland along with Watson for Jones. That's how bad the other stuff is.

[EliWasrobbed]

Watson is a terrible QB at this point, so at least on field, I'm not sure swapping Jones for him gets us anywhere.

Then there's the contract and the off field stuff.

If this trade were to really go down, I'd want at least 2 #1 picks from Cleveland along with Watson for Jones. That's how bad the other stuff is.

if you think Watson is terrible... what does that make Daniel Jones?

I don't know how many years he would screw with our cap, but getting a 2nd AND an upgrade at QB? I'm in.

[AYM]

if you think Watson is terrible... what does that make Daniel Jones?

I don't know how many years he would screw with our cap, but getting a 2nd AND an upgrade at QB? I'm in.

Also terrible. If you put 2023 Watson on last year's Giants, I don't think he'd be any more productive than Jones was.

[EliWasrobbed]

Also terrible. If you put 2023 Watson on last year's Giants, I don't think he'd be any more productive than Jones was.

well Tyrod and Tommy devito werre both more productive than Jones, so I find that hard to believe.

[MightyGiants]

https://x.com/art_stapleton/status/1760747017494777920?s=20

[DaveBrown74]

https://x.com/art_stapleton/status/1760747017494777920?s=20

I can't see any way the Pats don't take a QB. I guess nothing is impossible, but I'd be truly shocked, as their in-house options are terrible, and they have a brand new regime coming in. The only way I could see the Giants moving from 6 to 3 is if the Pats traded up from 3 to 1, and then the Bears moved down from 3 to 6. I guess that's not impossible, but it feels like the mother of all longshots to me.