Dane Bugler's "the Beast" as a horizontal draft board

[MightyGiants]

This is one of the ways NFL set up their boards to see where the strength of positions are by round




https://x.com/clt_ny/status/1778044971796299962

[MightyGiants]

If you subscribe to the Athletic (I think it's worth the subscription)

https://x.com/dpbrugler/status/1778022764449808532

[uconnjack8]

I really like Odunze and the Giants may need a true #1 WR as much as any team I can remember, but man is that position group deep.

[MightyGiants]

I really like Odunze and the Giants may need a true #1 WR as much as any team I can remember, but man is that position group deep.

The way I look at the WR position.  The top 3 are elite prospects with, say, a 75% chance of becoming a true number on WRs.  Beyond them, you are looking at prospects that might prove to be good in the league but have maybe a 10% to 20% chance of becoming true number-one WRs.

[Rosehill Jimmy]

Similar approach without the subscription

https://draftboardguru.com/documents/2024draftboardOff_Post.pdf

[Painter]

Some of the differences between Brugler's (with a r) and Martz's may not be great but can be worthy of note, not that it matters beyond whatever importance we impart to it.

Cheers!

[MightyGiants]

Similar approach without the subscription

https://draftboardguru.com/documents/2024draftboardOff_Post.pdf

https://x.com/JimNagy_SB/status/1778092639176306823

[Bob In PA]

Some of the differences between Brugler's (with a r) and Martz's may not be great but can be worthy of note, not that it matters beyond whatever importance we impart to it.

Larry: Thanks for pointing out that Dane is not a musician. LOL

[H-Town G-Fan]

Nabers is ranked as third overall prospect in the draft. I know some want a prototypical X (Odunze)--and there are some concerns with Nabers--but I'd be very happy with a Nabers pick at #6.