Jim,
I have to disagree. The reality is we have to believe rather far fetched and unlikely version of events to even begin to consider letting Zimmerman off from the homicide he committed. We know for a fact that Zimmerman stalked Martin. We have no indication that Martin jumped him as you claim.
As for the law this comes right out of it:
A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity, and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
1) It's reasonable to assert Zimmerman initiated the confrontation so he was "not attacked" as required by law
2) As I said a much larger man engaged in a fist fight does not have a reasonable expectation of death or serious bodily harm.
I have to disagree. The reality is we have to believe rather far fetched and unlikely version of events to even begin to consider letting Zimmerman off from the homicide he committed. We know for a fact that Zimmerman stalked Martin. We have no indication that Martin jumped him as you claim.
As for the law this comes right out of it:
A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity, and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
1) It's reasonable to assert Zimmerman initiated the confrontation so he was "not attacked" as required by law
2) As I said a much larger man engaged in a fist fight does not have a reasonable expectation of death or serious bodily harm.