Quote from: DaveBrown74 on Today at 02:09:08 PMIf it were your decision, how long would you be willing to tolerate more bad play from him before making a change
Quote from: sxdxca38 on May 19, 2024, 08:58:43 PMI appreciate very much what you have presented here, however, here is how I am seeing it.The contract given to Jones was deemed the "going rate" for a starting QB in the league. Jones' salary placed him tied for 13th in the league and will be declining each year. It's highly unlikely the Jones' camp would have agreed to a lower salary given the Giants' desire to have an out after two years.
I agree with you that not exercising his 5th year option was the wrong move.
However, giving him a new contract after the way he played in 2022 was definitely the right move.
The issue that I have was not the contract itself, but to me it was the size of the contract. If they were to have re-signed him in the range of around 30 million a year, then I think that is fair, but 40 million was too much.
As for your last statement, I would say it is yet to be determined, but this year we will all get our answer.
Quote from: jgrangers2 on Today at 02:53:49 PMLooking like it might be:
20-93-72
10-16-13
50-91-96
73-21-26
Really not a fan of sitting Kakko but whatever
Quote from: DaveBrown74 on Today at 01:23:12 PMThink that's the first time I've gotten the yellow one first.Nice!
Strands #82
"Raise a glass"
🟡🔵🔵🔵
🔵🔵🔵
Quote from: Philosophers on Today at 12:01:43 PMI am not sure how I feel about what he said. What is there to teach Andrew Thomas? Line him up at LT and get him reps.
Why bounce people around so much now? Give them 1 position to become an expert then teach others later.
Quote from: Philosophers on May 21, 2024, 10:24:06 AMHe's not so special that if the OL only allows a very short amount of time before a QB gets hit that he will be effective. NFL CBs can tie him early for a split second to screw up any effectiveness. It's about the OL.