Quote from: BluesCruz on May 26, 2024, 06:54:37 AMCheers to youThis is what he does. Feel honored he even took the time. You bring this xxxx upon yourself with outrageous statements as the preponderance of fact. You do however, provoke discussion, even if it is to expose the lunacy. I have seen marked improvement and there is some wisdom tucked in there. So to that point keep up the good work. If you didn't exist, Rich would have to invent you.
but no need to hurl insults my friend
Being a Giants fan can elicit frustration of late. I'll chalk it up to that
enjoy your day
Quote from: DaveBrown74 on May 26, 2024, 07:57:48 AMI went back and looked at various lists of the best CBs of the 2000s and 2010s. I couldn't find one below 185 and the vast majority were, as @MightyGiants noted earlier in the thread, somewhere in the 190-210 range.
There have clearly been CBs under 180 in the NFL and are now, but it's a small group, and, based on the moderate amount of backward looking I did, the group does not appear to include any who were distinctly above average.
I think the statement that size (including weight) matters much more for CBs than it does for WRs was a pretty accurate one based on the evidence.
Quote from: uconnjack8 on May 26, 2024, 07:37:00 AMLooking at where almost 60% land, that would likely put Flott more than 2 standard deviations from the mean.
Quote from: MightyGiants on May 26, 2024, 06:57:33 AMThis article covers lightest current CBs
https://hortonbarbell.com/average-height-and-weight-of-an-nfl-cornerback/
Quote from: MightyGiants on May 26, 2024, 06:57:33 AMThis article covers lightest current CBs
https://hortonbarbell.com/average-height-and-weight-of-an-nfl-cornerback/