Big Blue Huddle

Quote from: T200 on October 25, 2024, 10:14:19 AMWhere was the attack? I didn't see it.

MG quoted me with this retort.

I define "huge" as a player who is or potentially is a franchise-caliber QB.  Backups or journey-level QBS who you believe to be better than Jones don't make the cut, by my definition

I never ever called acquiring a backup or Journey-level QB a "huge" deal. I said I don't know about it being huge. So their was no reason to respond directly to me. 

Quote from: TDToomer on October 25, 2024, 01:47:41 PMMG quoted me with this retort.

I define "huge" as a player who is or potentially is a franchise-caliber QB.  Backups or journey-level QBS who you believe to be better than Jones don't make the cut, by my definition

I never ever called acquiring a backup or Journey-level QB a "huge" deal. I said I don't know about it being huge. So their was no reason to respond directly to me. 

This is none of my business, but to be fair you did quote him first when he responded to another user when he said he didn't see any realistically available QBs that would be considered huge, in his opinion.

It appears to be nothing more than a continuation of a conversation chain that you inserted yourself in. It all reads to me as a genuine conversation between several people up until you claimed an attack.

Quote from: TDToomer on October 25, 2024, 01:47:41 PMMG quoted me with this retort.

I define "huge" as a player who is or potentially is a franchise-caliber QB.  Backups or journey-level QBS who you believe to be better than Jones don't make the cut, by my definition

I never ever called acquiring a backup or Journey-level QB a "huge" deal. I said I don't know about it being huge. So their was no reason to respond directly to me. 

That wasn't an attack. He specifically stated twice that that is his definition.