Big Blue Huddle

Quote from: Jclayton92 on December 29, 2024, 05:25:05 PMI'd rather pick 8th, than pick another backup qb with a high pick.

I am glad you are happy, I'm not

Quote from: kingm56 on December 29, 2024, 05:34:25 PMGood - We will need another bad  year to secure a QB in 2026; this isn't a 1-year fix, but I firmly believe we're starting to collect the core ingredients to be competitive. 

The coach and GM won't make another bad year. Not a chance.

Quote from: MightyGiants on December 29, 2024, 05:19:38 PMThat's my expectation.  The Giants beat the Philly backups, and there they are.  I don't know why people are saying they are happy with picking 3rd, as that's not likely to happen.

You just know the Eagles will purposefully lose to screw the Giants.

On a related Eagles note - the other thread was locked. In 2024, you are allowed to
protect four players per game on your Practice Squad. The Eagles won't be able to poach DJ from the Vikings PS


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The real danger is that Schoen overpays on a trade up. Never trust a desperate GM.

https://x.com/art_stapleton/status/1873497536641830968?s=46&t=1vcQIN8GqF5J2oLdxEVEJQ

Quote from: katkavage on December 29, 2024, 05:31:25 PMStill no answer. The reality is they will be bad next year with a QB from this year or not. And on and on it goes.

I've given my answer a dozen times in a dozen other threads. I would sign a vet on a 2-year deal (or 3 with a team option after 2) and then draft someone in the 1st in 2026. That way, the rookie doesn't have to start in year 1 on a terrible team (like Caleb Williams) and he has a year to learn the system.

Quote from: Stringer Bell on December 29, 2024, 05:45:39 PMI've given my answer a dozen times in a dozen other threads. I would sign a vet on a 2-year deal (or 3 with a team option after 2) and then draft someone in the 1st in 2026. That way, the rookie doesn't have to start in year 1 on a terrible team (like Caleb Williams) and he has a year to learn the system.

Who? And what if Daboll and Schoen return.? You give them  at least two more years?

Quote from: Doc16LT56 on December 29, 2024, 05:42:34 PMThe real danger is that Schoen overpays on a trade up. Never trust a desperate GM.

Unless the Giants drop to 4th , they would not have  to trade up unless The Pats trade down to get more picks .

I don't care about the number one overall because of the QB. I care about it because it could not only parlay more high picks, but we would get number one in each round.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Quote from: Stringer Bell on December 29, 2024, 05:45:39 PMI've given my answer a dozen times in a dozen other threads. I would sign a vet on a 2-year deal (or 3 with a team option after 2) and then draft someone in the 1st in 2026. That way, the rookie doesn't have to start in year 1 on a terrible team (like Caleb Williams) and he has a year to learn the system.

That makes sense

Waste 2-3 years of Nabers and Tracy , Theo Johnson , dru Philips, Banks

Makes perfect sense

Quote from: Brooklyn Dave on December 29, 2024, 05:52:41 PMUnless the Giants drop to 4th , they would not have  to trade up unless The Pats trade down to get more picks .

Cleveland is down 2 scores in the second half, so there's a good chance they drop to 4th. Either way, it's very possible New England trades down and QBs go 1st and 2nd. Schoen engaged NE last year about trading up for a QB, but NE wanted Maye for themselves and Schoen wasn't motivated to overpay. This year he knows his job is very much on the line.

Quote from: killarich on December 29, 2024, 05:57:06 PMThat makes sense

Waste 2-3 years of Nabers and Tracy , Theo Johnson , dru Philips, Banks

Makes perfect sense

You're the one not making any sense. There's a 99% chance Jamies Winston would perform better the next 2 years than Sanders. So how is it wasting those years? If anything, your suggestion of drafting a subpar rookie would be far more likely to waste the young talent on the team.

Quote from: Stringer Bell on December 29, 2024, 06:02:51 PMYou're the one not making any sense. There's a 99% chance Jamies Winston would perform better the next 2 years than Sanders. So how is it wasting those years? If anything, your suggestion of drafting a subpar rookie would be far more likely to waste the young talent on the team.

Are you serious right now ? Winston ?

If Sanders isn't ready for 2 years ... How in the blue hell do you know the QB we get in 2 years will also require that 2 year learning window


ONCE AGAIN like I said.. it is WASTING our young talent on rookie money POINT BLANK

Quote from: katkavage on December 29, 2024, 05:51:43 PMWho? And what if Daboll and Schoen return.? You give them  at least two more years?

Winston. Mac Jones. Fields. Mariota.

I would take Will Johnson and 2 years of any one of them over watching this team flounder for 5 years with Sanders.

Quote from: Stringer Bell on December 29, 2024, 06:05:14 PMWinston. Mac Jones. Fields. Mariota.

I would take Will Johnson and 2 years of any one of them over watching this team flounder for 5 years with Sanders.

Mac Jones ? Mariota ?

Might as well resign Daniel Jones

This has to be a joke ... a bad one at that